Two systems move money into Wyoming politics and civic organising. One is a private foundation granting to public charities under rules that require disclosure and, for anything else, expenditure responsibility. The other is a chain of 501(c)(4) organisations that need name no donor at all. This map sets them side by side, labels every entity by its tax status, and shows where they touch. Each node opens the filings, the people and the sources.
Sorted by amount. Column headers re-sort the table. DOC = read off a primary filing · SEC = from a transcription of a filing not opened directly · INF = a structural relationship with no traceable dollar.
| From | To | Amount | Period | Conf. | Source |
|---|
Wyoming money in this record runs on two separate systems. They are governed by different rules, they disclose different things, and on the evidence of the filings they do not carry each other’s money.
A private foundation grants to public charities. Contributions into the foundation are tax-deductible; its investment income is taxed at 1.39% excise rather than at capital-gains rates. It may fund a 501(c)(3) freely. It may fund a 501(c)(4) only with a written charitable-purpose restriction and expenditure responsibility. It may never fund a political action committee.
Across five returns the Storer Foundation reports two grants to a non-charity, both to the same organisation, both disclosed by name. Everything else is coded PC.
A 501(c)(4) may raise money without naming a donor, may advocate on policy, and may support or oppose candidates so long as that is not its primary activity. It may give to a political action committee. When it does, the committee discloses the c4’s name and not the c4’s donors.
Sixteen Thirty Fund, New Venture Fund and four other national funders put roughly $11.7 million into one Sheridan 501(c)(4), which funded two committees and four Wyoming organisations.
Form 990-PF Part VI-B (Part VII-B on older forms) asks a private foundation, under penalty of perjury, five questions about political and lobbying expenditure. Five consecutive returns were read.
| Question | TY2020 | TY2021 | TY2022 | TY2023 | TY2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5a(1) attempt to influence legislation | — | No | No | No | No |
| 5a(2) influence a specific election, or carry on directly or indirectly any voter registration drive | — | No | No | No | No |
| 5a(4) grant to an organisation other than a §4945(d)(4)(A) charity | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| 5b did any transaction fail the §53.4945 exceptions | — | No | No | — | — |
| 5d claims exemption because it maintained expenditure responsibility | Yes | Yes | Yes | — | — |
The TY2020 render does not carry the checkbox state for lines 5a(1)–(5); the expenditure responsibility statement attached to that return establishes the 5a(4) answer.
Wyoming Civic Engagement Network did not obtain its own IRS exemption until February 2024. A private foundation cannot grant directly to an organisation without an exemption, so before that date the money went through intermediaries — and on each occasion the destination is written into the purpose line of the foundation’s own return.
| Year | Paid to | Purpose text as filed | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2021 | Schwab Charitable Fund | “WYOMING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT NETWORK” | $355,000 |
| FY2022 | NEO Philanthropy Inc | “WYOMING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT NETWORK” | $400,000 |
| FY2023 | NEO Philanthropy | “WYOMING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT NETWORK” | $130,000 |
| FY2024 | Wyoming Civic Engagement Network, directly | General institutional support | $200,000 |
| Total traced | $1,085,000 | ||
The routing is disclosed rather than concealed: a reader of the foundation’s return can see the destination in every year, including the years the payment was not made directly.
Wyoming Civic Engagement Network is a 501(c)(3), recognised in February 2024, employer identification number 93-3777806. Wyoming Voter Network is not a separate organisation at all. Its own privacy policy opens: “The Wyoming Voter Network is a special project of the Wyoming Donor Alliance, a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization.” A full-text search of every electronically filed Form 990 from calendar year 2014 forward returns no return of any organisation containing the phrase “Wyoming Voter Network.” It has no employer identification number and it files nothing.
WyCEN’s own posting for an executive director describes the role as a joint position over both, reporting to both boards, supervising WyCEN’s Field Strategist, a joint WyCEN/WVN Data Organizer and WVN’s Field Manager, and developing fundraising plans “in partnership with the Executive Director of the Wyoming Donor Alliance.” The advertised salary is $80,000–$90,000.
Better Wyoming has the same shape: a 501(c)(3) that began operating in 2017 and obtained recognition in May 2020, and Better Wyoming Action + Research, a 501(c)(4) incorporated on 13 December 2023 at the same Laramie post-office box and recognised in April 2025. The Wyoming Donor Alliance has funded both halves — $66,000 to the charity and $7,613 to the c4.
WyCEN’s own hiring page describes an executive director who will “oversee two networks of 26 organizational partners (both of which are expanding annually).” The twenty-six are named nowhere. What follows is where the search went and what each place held.
| Where the roster was looked for | What is there |
|---|---|
| wycen.org, complete site map | Six pages: home, about, take-action, and three hiring pages. No partners, members, coalition or table page exists. The take-action page is still unedited Squarespace template copy about “conservation projects” and “threatened places.” |
| wyomingvoternetwork.org, complete site map | Two pages: a one-paragraph home page and the privacy policy. |
| wydonoralliance.org, complete site map | One page. No grantees, no target, no staff, no board. |
| WyCEN Form 990 for 2024, filed 15 November 2025 | Schedules 990, A, B and O. No Schedule I. Line 13, grants paid: $0. A grantmaker names its grantees; an operating organisation has no such line to fill in. |
| Full-text search of every e-filed Form 990, 2014 to present | “Wyoming Civic Engagement Network” appears in 13 returns, every one of them a funder’s. “Wyoming Voter Network” appears in none. |
Nine organisations can be tied to this layer by a document. Seventeen cannot.
| Organisation | How it is tied | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Better Wyoming | Its own campaign page: “With the help of our partners in the Wyoming Civic Engagement Network, we provide hands-on opportunities to learn.” Also a Donor Alliance grantee, $56,000 in 2024 and $10,000 in 2023. | Self-identified, and money |
| Better Wyoming Action + Research | Donor Alliance $7,613 (2024); Western Futures Fund $30,000 (2024) | Money |
| Equality State Policy Center | Donor Alliance $10,000 (2023); co-hosted Capitol Collaboration Day at the State Capitol with WyCEN, through its Chair Project | Money, and a joint event |
| Wyoming Rising, Powell | Donor Alliance $15,480 (2024) | Money |
| Wyoming Independent Citizens Coalition | Co-hosted Capitol Collaboration Day with WyCEN; president Carla Gregorio | Joint event |
| Hispanic Organization for Progress & Education, Cheyenne | Co-hosted Capitol Collaboration Day with WyCEN | Joint event |
| America Votes, Washington DC | Donor Alliance grantee in 2023 and 2024 — the only recipient in both years | Money. It is a national hub, not a Wyoming partner |
| Wyoming Neighbors for Housing | Its executive director, Jason Mincer, sits on WyCEN’s board | A person, not an organisational tie |
| Lander Womentum | Its co-founder, MJ Greene, sits on WyCEN’s board | A person, not an organisational tie |
A 501(c)(3) files Schedule B, which lists its substantial donors — and the public copy is redacted. The donors’ own returns are not. Every line below was read on the funder’s filing rather than on WyCEN’s.
| Funder | Where | Filing | Purpose text as filed | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| George B Storer Foundation | Jackson WY | 990-PF TY2024 | General institutional support | $200,000 |
| Donor Advised Charitable Giving | Lone Tree CO | 990 Schedule I 2024 | “PUBLIC, SOCIETAL BENEFIT” | $145,000 |
| NEO Philanthropy Inc | New York NY | 990 Schedule I 2024 | “Program Grant” | $54,413 |
| Natrona Collective Health Trust | Casper WY | 990-PF 2024 | “GENERAL OPERATING” | $40,000 |
| Tides Foundation | San Francisco CA | 990 Schedule I 2024 | “EQUITY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT” | $20,000 |
| Elbridge & Evelyn Stuart Foundation | Jackson WY | 990-PF 2024 | “GENERAL USE” | $10,000 |
| Joan & James Shapiro Foundation | Chicago IL | 990-PF 2024 | “SEE ABOVE” | $2,500 |
| Identified on 2024 filings | $471,913 | |||
| WyCEN’s reported 2024 contributions | $507,713 | |||
| Share of a year’s income recoverable by name | 92.9% | |||
| Ladd Family Foundation | Dover MA | 990-PF 2025 | “GENERAL PURPOSE” | $20,000 |
Fiscal years do not align exactly across eight organisations. A grant one foundation books in 2024 may reach the recipient in 2025. The total is a reconstruction from eight independent returns, not a reconciliation to WyCEN’s books.
Both returns are prepared by Highpoint CPAs LLC of 401 Fremont Street, Laramie. Both forms ask, at Part VI line 19, how the organisation makes its governing documents and financial statements available to the public.
“DOCUMENTS MADE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.”
“NO DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC.”
Both answers are lawful. The difference is the whole point of running the two entities side by side: the charitable half is answerable to anyone who asks, and the political half is answerable to no one.
Western Futures Fund Inc of Sheridan filed a 2024 Schedule I listing twenty-two grantees and $6,780,000. One is a 501(c)(3). The other twenty-one are 501(c)(4)s, 527 political committees and one labour organisation, spread across Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, Alaska, Nebraska, Utah and Oregon. Three lines of that page reach this record.
| Line | Recipient | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Wyoming Way PAC · PO Box 42, Lingle WY | 527 | $100,000 |
| 11 | Way Back PAC · 30 N Gould St #4205, Sheridan WY | 527 | $100,000 |
| 14 | Wyoming Donor Alliance · PO Box 3462, Jackson WY | 501(c)(4) | $75,000 |
| 19 | Better Wyoming Action and Research · Laramie WY | 501(c)(4) | $30,000 |
The fund’s own address is 30 N Gould Street #23616, Sheridan — the same building as the committee on line 11, a different suite number at the same registered-agent mail drop. Its three officers, president Michael Hennesy, treasurer Jeremy Krones and secretary Christopher Hirsch, each report one hour a week and no compensation. Gross receipts for the year were $8,735,000.
In 2013 ProPublica, Montana Free Press and High Country News jointly published an account of Montana Hunters and Anglers in the 2012 United States Senate race. The structure they described is the one set out above, at national scale and thirteen years earlier.
“We figured having a local brand like that and partnering with them on local issues made more sense than having a D.C. brand.”
— Navin Nayak, League of Conservation Voters, quoted in that reporting
That sentence is the clearest published explanation of why national money arrives under a local name. It is not an inference drawn here; it is a funder describing the strategy.
The League of Conservation Voters appears in both records. Way Back PAC’s federal schedule lists $32,000 from the LCV Victory Fund.
The final column of the map is people. Each is placed only where a record puts them, and every role carries its own confidence marking — documented, secondary, or a structural inference. The pattern the map shows is not that individuals moved money between the two rails. It is that the same small number of people hold roles on both: a consultant who founded the endorsing organisation and both firms the state committee paid; a director who ran the statewide donor network one year and chaired the Jackson organisation the next; a foundation chief executive who is also a legislator and formed a local committee; a foundation trustee who is also a county commissioner and a director of a grantee.
One of the consulting firms describes its own training programme as producing participants who “run for office, serve on boards, and work as community organizers.” A partner in that firm ran for county commission in 2026 and won.
No document in this record shows foundation money reaching a political action committee, and the foundation has certified in five consecutive returns that it paid nothing, directly or indirectly, to influence an election or to carry on a voter registration drive. The two rails share people — the same names appear on a foundation board, a charity board, a donor network and a committee treasurer’s line — and they share a state. They are not shown sharing money.