A statewide file · the charitable rail and the political rail · Wyoming

The Wyoming Channel

Two systems move money into Wyoming politics and civic organising. One is a private foundation granting to public charities under rules that require disclosure and, for anything else, expenditure responsibility. The other is a chain of 501(c)(4) organisations that need name no donor at all. This map sets them side by side, labels every entity by its tax status, and shows where they touch. Each node opens the filings, the people and the sources.

$16.9M
Storer grants paid, FY2020–FY2024
2
non-charity grants in five years, both disclosed
$1,085,000
traced to one grantee through three vehicles
$11.7M
into one Sheridan 501(c)(4)
0
donors that 501(c)(4) must name
11
people appearing in more than one layer
$5,500
reaching the Teton County race
Where this reaches Teton County
$5,500The three winnersChin $2,500 · Propst $1,500 · Dunford $1,500
$320,000Shelter JHWestern Futures Fund and Arnold Ventures
$150,000JH Conservation Alliancefrom the Storer Foundation · FY2021–24
$12,500Keep Jackson Wholeformed 12 days before the primary
$77,305The two consulting firmsfrom Wyoming Way PAC · one founder
$135,000Wyoming PathwaysWilson · from the Storer Foundation
P.O. Box 4202Wyoming Way PACa state committee filing from Jackson
11The operatorspeople who appear in more than one layer
Amounts are read from Forms 990-PF Part XV, Forms 990 Schedule I, the Wyoming Secretary of State, the Teton County Clerk and the Federal Election Commission. The commission seats are elected at large. Selecting an entry opens it on the map below.
Documented — read off a filing Secondary — transcription of a filing Structural — a relationship, not a dollar
Text size

Every flow on this map

Sorted by amount. Column headers re-sort the table. DOC = read off a primary filing · SEC = from a transcription of a filing not opened directly · INF = a structural relationship with no traceable dollar.

FromToAmount PeriodConf.Source

Two rails

Wyoming money in this record runs on two separate systems. They are governed by different rules, they disclose different things, and on the evidence of the filings they do not carry each other’s money.

The charitable rail

A private foundation grants to public charities. Contributions into the foundation are tax-deductible; its investment income is taxed at 1.39% excise rather than at capital-gains rates. It may fund a 501(c)(3) freely. It may fund a 501(c)(4) only with a written charitable-purpose restriction and expenditure responsibility. It may never fund a political action committee.

Across five returns the Storer Foundation reports two grants to a non-charity, both to the same organisation, both disclosed by name. Everything else is coded PC.

The political rail

A 501(c)(4) may raise money without naming a donor, may advocate on policy, and may support or oppose candidates so long as that is not its primary activity. It may give to a political action committee. When it does, the committee discloses the c4’s name and not the c4’s donors.

Sixteen Thirty Fund, New Venture Fund and four other national funders put roughly $11.7 million into one Sheridan 501(c)(4), which funded two committees and four Wyoming organisations.

What the Storer Foundation’s own returns say

Form 990-PF Part VI-B (Part VII-B on older forms) asks a private foundation, under penalty of perjury, five questions about political and lobbying expenditure. Five consecutive returns were read.

QuestionTY2020TY2021TY2022TY2023TY2024
5a(1) attempt to influence legislationNoNoNoNo
5a(2) influence a specific election, or carry on directly or indirectly any voter registration driveNoNoNoNo
5a(4) grant to an organisation other than a §4945(d)(4)(A) charityYesYesYesNoNo
5b did any transaction fail the §53.4945 exceptionsNoNo
5d claims exemption because it maintained expenditure responsibilityYesYesYes

The TY2020 render does not carry the checkbox state for lines 5a(1)–(5); the expenditure responsibility statement attached to that return establishes the 5a(4) answer.

The two non-charity grants are named on the returns. Both went to Wyoming Hunters and Anglers Alliance of Laramie — $60,000 on 19 June 2019 and $60,000 on 15 July 2020, both for “general institutional support for the promotion of conservation of Wyoming’s wildlife, the protection of sportsmen’s access, and the defense of public lands.” Both were fully expended. The foundation obtained grantee reports on 9 September 2020, 10 September 2021 and 15 September 2023, recorded that no funds had been diverted, and stated that it made no independent verification because it had no reason to doubt the reports. That is the §4945 machinery working exactly as the statute requires.

Where a grant names its destination

Wyoming Civic Engagement Network did not obtain its own IRS exemption until February 2024. A private foundation cannot grant directly to an organisation without an exemption, so before that date the money went through intermediaries — and on each occasion the destination is written into the purpose line of the foundation’s own return.

YearPaid toPurpose text as filedAmount
FY2021Schwab Charitable Fund“WYOMING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT NETWORK”$355,000
FY2022NEO Philanthropy Inc“WYOMING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT NETWORK”$400,000
FY2023NEO Philanthropy“WYOMING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT NETWORK”$130,000
FY2024Wyoming Civic Engagement Network, directlyGeneral institutional support$200,000
Total traced$1,085,000

The routing is disclosed rather than concealed: a reader of the foundation’s return can see the destination in every year, including the years the payment was not made directly.

The c3 and the c4 that share an executive

Wyoming Civic Engagement Network is a 501(c)(3), recognised in February 2024, employer identification number 93-3777806. Wyoming Voter Network is not a separate organisation at all. Its own privacy policy opens: “The Wyoming Voter Network is a special project of the Wyoming Donor Alliance, a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization.” A full-text search of every electronically filed Form 990 from calendar year 2014 forward returns no return of any organisation containing the phrase “Wyoming Voter Network.” It has no employer identification number and it files nothing.

WyCEN’s own posting for an executive director describes the role as a joint position over both, reporting to both boards, supervising WyCEN’s Field Strategist, a joint WyCEN/WVN Data Organizer and WVN’s Field Manager, and developing fundraising plans “in partnership with the Executive Director of the Wyoming Donor Alliance.” The advertised salary is $80,000–$90,000.

Better Wyoming has the same shape: a 501(c)(3) that began operating in 2017 and obtained recognition in May 2020, and Better Wyoming Action + Research, a 501(c)(4) incorporated on 13 December 2023 at the same Laramie post-office box and recognised in April 2025. The Wyoming Donor Alliance has funded both halves — $66,000 to the charity and $7,613 to the c4.

Shared staff between an affiliated 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) is lawful provided the costs are allocated between the two entities according to the work actually done for each. The arrangement itself is ordinary. What the public filings do not show is the allocation.

A network of twenty-six that publishes no roster

WyCEN’s own hiring page describes an executive director who will “oversee two networks of 26 organizational partners (both of which are expanding annually).” The twenty-six are named nowhere. What follows is where the search went and what each place held.

Where the roster was looked forWhat is there
wycen.org, complete site mapSix pages: home, about, take-action, and three hiring pages. No partners, members, coalition or table page exists. The take-action page is still unedited Squarespace template copy about “conservation projects” and “threatened places.”
wyomingvoternetwork.org, complete site mapTwo pages: a one-paragraph home page and the privacy policy.
wydonoralliance.org, complete site mapOne page. No grantees, no target, no staff, no board.
WyCEN Form 990 for 2024, filed 15 November 2025Schedules 990, A, B and O. No Schedule I. Line 13, grants paid: $0. A grantmaker names its grantees; an operating organisation has no such line to fill in.
Full-text search of every e-filed Form 990, 2014 to present“Wyoming Civic Engagement Network” appears in 13 returns, every one of them a funder’s. “Wyoming Voter Network” appears in none.
The organisation’s own tax return explains the design. Schedule O, Part VI line 12c, verbatim: “It is the policy of WyCEN that the organization does not make decisions about who we partner with, or how we work with partners, based on or influenced by other partners. WyCEN maintains independent relationships with each partner. When conflict or disagreement between two partners arises, WyCEN will remain a neutral party in that conflict or disagreement… WyCEN is a network, not a coalition, and partners are not required to work with each other on any strategy or issue. Additionally, WyCEN does not participate in personnel decisions or board management for any partner organizations.”

Twenty-six bilateral relationships, hub and spoke, disclosed to nobody — including, by the terms of that policy, to each other. There is no membership list because there is no membership.

Nine of the twenty-six, and how each one is known

Nine organisations can be tied to this layer by a document. Seventeen cannot.

OrganisationHow it is tiedBasis
Better WyomingIts own campaign page: “With the help of our partners in the Wyoming Civic Engagement Network, we provide hands-on opportunities to learn.” Also a Donor Alliance grantee, $56,000 in 2024 and $10,000 in 2023.Self-identified, and money
Better Wyoming Action + ResearchDonor Alliance $7,613 (2024); Western Futures Fund $30,000 (2024)Money
Equality State Policy CenterDonor Alliance $10,000 (2023); co-hosted Capitol Collaboration Day at the State Capitol with WyCEN, through its Chair ProjectMoney, and a joint event
Wyoming Rising, PowellDonor Alliance $15,480 (2024)Money
Wyoming Independent Citizens CoalitionCo-hosted Capitol Collaboration Day with WyCEN; president Carla GregorioJoint event
Hispanic Organization for Progress & Education, CheyenneCo-hosted Capitol Collaboration Day with WyCENJoint event
America Votes, Washington DCDonor Alliance grantee in 2023 and 2024 — the only recipient in both yearsMoney. It is a national hub, not a Wyoming partner
Wyoming Neighbors for HousingIts executive director, Jason Mincer, sits on WyCEN’s boardA person, not an organisational tie
Lander WomentumIts co-founder, MJ Greene, sits on WyCEN’s boardA person, not an organisational tie
The last two rows are marked differently on purpose. A board seat is a person, and WyCEN’s own Schedule O states that it “does not participate in personnel decisions or board management for any partner organizations.” Where a board member works is a fact about that person. It is not evidence that their employer is one of the twenty-six, and it is not treated here as if it were. Seventeen of the twenty-six remain unidentified.

Nine tenths of a redacted donor list, rebuilt from other people’s returns

A 501(c)(3) files Schedule B, which lists its substantial donors — and the public copy is redacted. The donors’ own returns are not. Every line below was read on the funder’s filing rather than on WyCEN’s.

FunderWhereFilingPurpose text as filedAmount
George B Storer FoundationJackson WY990-PF TY2024General institutional support$200,000
Donor Advised Charitable GivingLone Tree CO990 Schedule I 2024“PUBLIC, SOCIETAL BENEFIT”$145,000
NEO Philanthropy IncNew York NY990 Schedule I 2024“Program Grant”$54,413
Natrona Collective Health TrustCasper WY990-PF 2024“GENERAL OPERATING”$40,000
Tides FoundationSan Francisco CA990 Schedule I 2024“EQUITY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT”$20,000
Elbridge & Evelyn Stuart FoundationJackson WY990-PF 2024“GENERAL USE”$10,000
Joan & James Shapiro FoundationChicago IL990-PF 2024“SEE ABOVE”$2,500
Identified on 2024 filings$471,913
WyCEN’s reported 2024 contributions$507,713
Share of a year’s income recoverable by name92.9%
Ladd Family FoundationDover MA990-PF 2025“GENERAL PURPOSE”$20,000

Fiscal years do not align exactly across eight organisations. A grant one foundation books in 2024 may reach the recipient in 2025. The total is a reconstruction from eight independent returns, not a reconciliation to WyCEN’s books.

Two of those eight are Jackson foundations, and both fund the newsroom on the same return. The Stuart Foundation gave WyoFile $10,000 alongside its WyCEN grant; the Storer Foundation gave WyoFile $75,000 alongside its $200,000. The Ladd Family Foundation’s Wyoming giving is otherwise entirely Teton County — Teton Free Clinic $20,000, Slow Food in the Tetons $25,000, Old Wilson Schoolhouse $5,000.

The same accountant, opposite answers to the same question

Both returns are prepared by Highpoint CPAs LLC of 401 Fremont Street, Laramie. Both forms ask, at Part VI line 19, how the organisation makes its governing documents and financial statements available to the public.

Wyoming Civic Engagement Network — 501(c)(3)

“DOCUMENTS MADE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.”

Wyoming Donor Alliance — 501(c)(4)

“NO DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC.”

Both answers are lawful. The difference is the whole point of running the two entities side by side: the charitable half is answerable to anyone who asks, and the political half is answerable to no one.

One page of one return, and what it carries

Western Futures Fund Inc of Sheridan filed a 2024 Schedule I listing twenty-two grantees and $6,780,000. One is a 501(c)(3). The other twenty-one are 501(c)(4)s, 527 political committees and one labour organisation, spread across Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, Alaska, Nebraska, Utah and Oregon. Three lines of that page reach this record.

LineRecipientTypeAmount
9Wyoming Way PAC · PO Box 42, Lingle WY527$100,000
11Way Back PAC · 30 N Gould St #4205, Sheridan WY527$100,000
14Wyoming Donor Alliance · PO Box 3462, Jackson WY501(c)(4)$75,000
19Better Wyoming Action and Research · Laramie WY501(c)(4)$30,000

The fund’s own address is 30 N Gould Street #23616, Sheridan — the same building as the committee on line 11, a different suite number at the same registered-agent mail drop. Its three officers, president Michael Hennesy, treasurer Jeremy Krones and secretary Christopher Hirsch, each report one hour a week and no compensation. Gross receipts for the year were $8,735,000.

Where the trail stops, and why it stops there. Western Futures Fund’s Schedule B is redacted, and since Revenue Procedure 2018-38 a 501(c)(4) does not report donor names to the IRS at all. Everything downstream of that fund is on the public record to the dollar. Everything upstream of it is unavailable by operation of federal tax procedure, not by anyone’s concealment.

The same template, documented in Montana a decade earlier

In 2013 ProPublica, Montana Free Press and High Country News jointly published an account of Montana Hunters and Anglers in the 2012 United States Senate race. The structure they described is the one set out above, at national scale and thirteen years earlier.

“We figured having a local brand like that and partnering with them on local issues made more sense than having a D.C. brand.”
— Navin Nayak, League of Conservation Voters, quoted in that reporting

That sentence is the clearest published explanation of why national money arrives under a local name. It is not an inference drawn here; it is a funder describing the strategy.

The League of Conservation Voters appears in both records. Way Back PAC’s federal schedule lists $32,000 from the LCV Victory Fund.

What this is not. Montana Hunters and Anglers is a different organisation in a different state from Wyoming Hunters and Anglers Alliance, the Laramie group that received the Storer Foundation’s two expenditure-responsibility grants. No shared officer, address, employer identification number or funder connects them, and none is asserted here. The Montana case is a documented precedent for the structure, not evidence about the Wyoming organisation.

The operators

The final column of the map is people. Each is placed only where a record puts them, and every role carries its own confidence marking — documented, secondary, or a structural inference. The pattern the map shows is not that individuals moved money between the two rails. It is that the same small number of people hold roles on both: a consultant who founded the endorsing organisation and both firms the state committee paid; a director who ran the statewide donor network one year and chaired the Jackson organisation the next; a foundation chief executive who is also a legislator and formed a local committee; a foundation trustee who is also a county commissioner and a director of a grantee.

One of the consulting firms describes its own training programme as producing participants who “run for office, serve on boards, and work as community organizers.” A partner in that firm ran for county commission in 2026 and won.

What this map does not establish

No document in this record shows foundation money reaching a political action committee, and the foundation has certified in five consecutive returns that it paid nothing, directly or indirectly, to influence an election or to carry on a voter registration drive. The two rails share people — the same names appear on a foundation board, a charity board, a donor network and a committee treasurer’s line — and they share a state. They are not shown sharing money.

Records not yet examined

  1. Wyoming Hunters and Anglers Alliance. Its EIN, exemption type and Forms 990. It is the only non-charity the foundation has funded in five years and it appears nowhere else in this record.
  2. Storer Forms 990-PF for FY2025 onward. Part VII lists trustees with addresses. The FY2024 return names Press Stephens as chairperson and Leslie Self as a trustee; the current published roster names neither, and adds Ryan Lance, Miles Cottom and Adrienne Reece.
  3. ANDREA SHIPLEY. A board member on the Wyoming Donor Alliance’s 2024 return, replacing Heather Smith. Who she is has not been established.
  4. LESLIE SPOONHUNTER. A WyCEN board member on the 2024 return. No organisation has been established for her.
  5. Wyoming Rising, Powell. A $15,480 grantee of the statewide donor table in 2024. Its employer identification number, tax status, officers and filings are all unknown.
  6. Donor Advised Charitable Giving, Lone Tree CO. A $145,000 funder of WyCEN with a Schedule I running to more than 4,600 lines. Not examined.
  7. Michael Hennesy, Jeremy Krones and Christopher Hirsch. The three officers of the Sheridan fund that supplies both committees and the donor table. Nothing has been established about any of them beyond the returns they sign.
  8. Whether Kate Sollitt and David Sollitt are related. David Sollitt was executive director of the Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance. The surname appears in two different layers of this structure and no document connects them.
  9. The cost-allocation agreement between WyCEN and the Wyoming Donor Alliance. Wyoming Voter Network has no filings of its own — it is a project of the Donor Alliance — so the allocation between the charitable and political halves appears in no public document.
  10. The seventeen unidentified partners. WyCEN’s own Schedule O states that documents are made available on request. Its 2025 Form 990 has not yet been filed.
  11. The Wyoming Donor Alliance fundraising page and the reported $1,579,000 target for the August 2026 primaries.
  12. Committee on States, State Leadership Project and Forward Wyoming — three funders of this layer that appear nowhere else in this record.
  13. Progress PAC. The Wyoming state PAC roster records a committee at PO Box 11072, Jackson, formed 8 February 2016 and terminated 3 January 2022, with Clyde L Propst III as chairman and Elizabeth Storer as treasurer. The filing itself has not been read.
  14. WyCEN’s partner roster. The network describes about twenty-six partner organisations and publishes no list.